1 Standing At The Precipice
Last updated
Last updated
In Week 1, we go through a brief summary of human history. We look at human progress, an example of a previous existential threat our species has encountered, and the magnitude of the issue.
Past & Present
Is life improving, globally?
Future
How good do you think life could be?
How bad do you think life could be?
Safeguarding Potential is a priority
Will live be good enough to make it worth protecting or will it be bad, implying we should stop a future from happening?
Are there arguments for safeguarding the future regardless of optimism or pessimism?
Does anyone would like to explain what an is?
Do you agree that this century is the period with our highest risk of existential catastrophe occurring?
How should you or as an individual respond to today's reflections?
How can we, as an individual, affect the world - good or bad?
Discussion 1
What do you think of the allegory in the quotation at the top of the page?
How much does this represent history? Are there any historical nuances that are looked over by this allegory?
At the end of the introduction, the author speaks of ‘possible heights of flourishing’, and ‘music we lack the ears to hear’.
How likely do you think it is that such a world is possible, and what could it look like?
Does the world of today have some ‘music’ that did not exist in humanity’s past?
What are some possible problems with the narrative of global progress over time? Does everyone think the world is improving?
Factory farming, bigger wars, or less respect for ancestors or nature
Discussion 2
Ord posits that ‘safeguarding humanity’s future should be a central priority of our time’
Do you agree with this?
How should protecting the future trade off with other morally important actions and vocations?
‘The Precipice gives our time immense meaning. In the grand course of history - if we make it that far -- this is what our time will be remembered for: for the highest levels of risk, and for humanity opening its eyes, coming into its maturity and guaranteeing its long and flourishing future. This is the meaning of our time.’
One assumption behind this book is that we live in a ‘time of perils’, where existential risk is unusually high. As Ord puts it, ‘Our actions have uniquely high stakes’.
Is this a reasonable assumption?
What evidence do we have for and against this position?
How should society ideally change in response to this era?
If we think the ‘time of perils’ is yet to come, how can we best prepare for this?